25 Sept 2019
TRANTER v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2019] NZHC 2417 [24 September 2019]
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2417
- Court
- High Court
The application was dismissed because it sought to re‑examine and quash convictions (which s14(2) of the Habeas Corpus Act precludes), was repetitive and barred by the Act's finality provision (s15), did not properly challenge the lawfulness of detention established by the warrant of commitment, and attempted improperly to use habeas corpus to obtain bail; appropriate remedies are appeal or prerogative of mercy.