14 Dec 2016
JONES v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2016] NZHC 3044
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 3044
- Court
- High Court
The 18 September 2013 letter was explanatory clarification of the operative 17 September 2008 decision and not a "decision" under s 6 of the Act; accordingly it was not reviewable, the proposed appeal raised no question of general principle, lacked merit on its substance (no entitlement to retain WINZ payments plus ACC arrears or to have ACC pay WINZ debts), and did not justify special leave which is refused.