20 Oct 2017
WALLIS v REBOLLEDO AND WITHERS [2017] NZHC 2565
- Citation
- [2017] NZFLR 832
- Court
- High Court
Although the District Court's findings that specified acts and a pattern of behaviour amounting to harassment were open on the evidence, the Judge did not separately and adequately consider whether a restraining order was necessary under s16(1)(c); because the Judge permitted the parties to continue working in close proximity and no separate necessity reasoning was given, the High Court concluded a restraining order was not necessary and set the order aside.