14 Feb 2013
TITO V TITO AND ANDREW COA CA856/2011
- Citation
- TITO V TITO AND ANDREW COA CA856/2011
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The stay application was dismissed because no date had been fixed for the general meeting and the applicant's position was not imminently threatened; r 12(3) did not provide the power relied on but the Court treated the application as if made under r 30(2) Supreme Court Rules 2004 and concluded a stay was unnecessary while preserving the applicant's right to renew the application if leave to appeal is granted or a meeting date becomes imminent.