15 Sept 1998
Rogers v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1998] NZACC 205
- Court
- District Court
On the evidence, particularly the investigator's observations which went uncontradicted, there was a serious doubt that home help was being provided; the respondent was therefore justified in suspending payments and the original suspension was correct; reinstatement requires a formal reassessment and proof of properly approved helper and receipts.