22 Jul 2016
HART v R [2016] NZCA 349
- Citation
- [2016] NZCA 349
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court upheld the district court judge's ruling that the evidence of S and B was admissible because the incidents were similar, unusual and occurred within a confined recent period, giving probative value on identity and propensity that outweighed the risk of unfair prejudice which could be managed by appropriate jury directions.