31 Mar 2023
STILLS v MCCORMACK [2023] NZHC 702
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 702
- Court
- High Court
Security for costs refused because applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to satisfy r 5.45(1)(b) and there was evidence the application was tactical; discovery refused because requested documents were not shown to be relevant or necessary to determine whether the applicant had an arguable caveatable interest and would be disproportionate in originating proceedings; application to restrain solicitors and counsel dismissed because there was no satisfactory evidence they were likely to be required as material witnesses and their advice was not shown to be in issue or unprivileged; substa…