4 Oct 2005
WAITEMATA DHB V NZ PSA CA CA118/05
- Citation
- openlaw-f3df1f19_b0ba_4357_a522_2d8368ee16dd.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Leave to appeal was granted because the two framed questions are questions of law of sufficient significance: whether liability under the collective agreement can arise without a specific employer direction, and whether liability can exist absent therapeutic or patient-care requirements; these involve legal issues akin to jurisdictional questions and are not merely disputed factual conclusions.