11 Sept 2012
BODY CORPORATE 398983 V ZURICH AUSTRALIAN INSURANCE LTD HC AK CIV 2012-404-2723
- Citation
- openlaw-abc8beb4_956c_4ce2_8873_de9b7344b3e8.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Tailored discovery was ordered for Category A and Category B because those documents are directly relevant and proportionate to determining whether an enforceable agreement for a $100 million indemnity limit was made and to the context for interpreting the policy; discovery for Category D was refused and no order made for Category C because ACM did not have Category C documents and Category D was not shown to be sufficiently relevant and proportionate and risked fishing.