26 May 2020
SLEIGHT v BECKIA HOLDINDGS LIMITED [2020] NZHC 1120
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 1120
- Court
- High Court
The Court held the challenged evidence was admissible: Neave's evidence comprised admissible objective background and drafted negotiations relevant to interpreting the 2012 RSMA; Farrell's brief, although mislabelled as a reply, was properly admissible as IAG's response to QBE's cross-claim and not a procedurally improper reply; the contested portions of McGunnigle's and Mace's expert evidence fell within their expertise, were substantially helpful to understanding industry practice and the contractual matrix, and did not amount to impermissible legal submissions, therefore objections were di…