27 Mar 2013
RICHARD GEEWIZ GEE CONSULTANTS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) V GEE HC AK CIV-2012-404-2456
- Citation
- openlaw-b2228819_3672_44fb_9904_18514c1d0341.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to show the defendants had no reasonably arguable defences: the court accepted for present purposes that the 2007 salary appeared authorised, found arguable evidence that the salary was fair, found an arguable defence that drawings were applied as salary so no overdrawn current account was established, and concluded there were arguable defences to alleged breaches of directors' duties requiring trial testing; assessment of compensation was inappropriate on summary judgment.