29 Mar 2011
HICKMAN & ORS V TURN AND WAVE LIMITED COA CA796/2009
- Citation
- HICKMAN & ORS V TURN AND WAVE LIMITED COA CA796/2009
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Leave to amend pleadings was refused for lack of evidential or legal merit and undue prejudice; representatives' statements were attributable to Blue Chip not developers because agents' authority from developers was confined to marketing and presenting SPAs; knowledge of sales agents not imputed to Greenstone or TWL (Icon had director-level knowledge via Bryers but that did not taint SPAs); Blue Chip agreements in issue were not debt securities generally (procurement fee under JVAs was the clearest candidate); option fees under PIP/PAC were exempt as in respect of interests in land but other…