29 Jun 2018
DAVID CHARLES BOSKETT v WILMA TANGDOL BOSKETT [2018] NZHC 1596
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1596
- Court
- High Court
The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving that the non-Pfizer funds were separate property and, in light of his non-disclosure and obstruction, the court treated the Heartland proceeds ($47,789 of which $40,000 was applied to purchase), the circa $10,000 cash deposit, and the Today's Realty Ltd balance ($17,989) as relationship property. That yielded additional relationship property of about $76,000, half to respondent $38,000; the court awarded interest at 12.5% p.a. for four years ($19,000) resulting in a total award of $57,000 to replace the Family Court figure. The appeal wa…