8 Feb 2023
High Court held the district court's refusal to hear the oral application amounted to a decision refusing interim suppression; the appellant had an arguable case under s 200(2)(a) based on mental health evidence, so the appeals were allowed and an interim name suppression order was made under s 200(4), to expire at the appellant's next District Court appearance unless continued under s 200(5).
27 Jan 2012
The caveat lapsed by operation of s145A and Reg 39 after the prescribed 14‑day period; consequently Woolford J's interim order made after lapse was per incuriam and is set aside; the Bank as mortgagee was lawfully entitled to proceed with its mortgagee sale and the applicant failed to establish an interest enforceable against the mortgagee to restrain sale.
29 Jul 2010
The Court made an interim order sustaining the caveat because it was not prepared to be categorical that the applicant lacked a prima facie caveatable interest and fairness required preserving the status quo to allow the applicant time to file affidavits; accordingly an interim order was appropriate pending further consideration.
16 Jun 2009
Given the urgency and the applicant's request that an order issue immediately, the court ordered that the caveat is not to lapse until further order and adopted the draft form of order filed by the applicant.