19 May 2016
POIHEGATAMA v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2016] NZHC 1047
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1047
- Court
- High Court
No arguable question of law existed because claimant was properly categorised as an earner in permanent employment and met cl 33(1) so cl 34 governed calculation; there was no evidence of a valid unpaid parental leave arrangement under the PLEP Act (including any s27(2)(d) four‑way agreement or required statutory notices), and cl 44 therefore did not apply; consequently special leave to appeal was declined.