26 Sept 2008
MELANIE TREVETHICK V MINISTRY OF HEALTH CA CA373/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-6f1146b0_e4ba_4332_af84_95cb4e7fe8fa.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Even if discrimination on the facts could be pleaded, the differential treatment alleged would be a justified limitation under s5 NZBORA because it reflects the ACC/no-fault policy choice; therefore there is no arguable appeal and strike-out was appropriate.