7 Feb 2012
ORLOV V NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY COA CA32/2012
- Citation
- openlaw-7b9ad18d_7306_4d39_8eb2_c57fc03b9876.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Registrar's refusal to waive security for costs and the setting down fee was correct because the appeal concerned interlocutory orders that did not extinguish the appellant's substantive claims, the circumstances were not exceptional, the appeal did not raise matters of genuine public importance sufficient to justify waiver, and impecuniosity alone was insufficient to warrant waiver.