19 Apr 2023
JONES v LLANHENNOCK TRUST PARTNERSHIP [2023] NZHC 833
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 833
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was declined because the applicant failed to identify any arguable error of law or fact, the issues lacked general or public importance, and further delay was unjustified; the stay was declined because the applicant had not obtained leave and, on balance, the stay factors did not favor him; the application for security for costs was dismissed because evidence established intransigence and unpaid judgments but not a sufficient basis to infer inability to pay such that r 5.45 threshold was met.