31 Aug 2017
KIM v THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE [2017] NZHC 2109
- Citation
- [2017] 3 NZLR 823
- Court
- High Court
The Minister's decision to surrender was lawfully made and open to a reasonable decision-maker because she addressed the specific judicially-identified deficiencies by obtaining material further information and expert advice, secured detailed case-specific diplomatic assurances from China, obtained MFAT commitments to proactive monitoring and timely access to unedited interrogation recordings, and reasonably concluded those measures mitigated real risks of torture, protected fair trial rights and ensured the death penalty would not be applied; discretionary grounds relating to delay, health a…