16 Jun 2021
RAZDAN RAFIQ v ATTORNEY_x001e_GENERAL [2021] NZSC 65
- Citation
- [2021] NZSC 65
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for an extension of time was dismissed because the applicant provided no adequate explanation for the long delay, the proposed appeal lacked merit and would inevitably fail given the uncontested factual basis that justified the s88B vexatious litigant order, and there was no appearance of miscarriage of justice; costs of $1,500 were awarded to the respondent.