20 Sept 2006
DUX INDUSTRIES LIMITED V LEAP AUSTRALASIA LIMITED AND ORS HC WN CIV 2006-485-2028 20 SEPTEMBER 200
- Citation
- HC WN CIV 2006-485-2028
- Court
- High Court
The interlocutory injunction was declined because the plaintiff failed to establish a serious question to be tried against the first defendant (no evidence the first defendant knew of and intentionally interfered with a subsisting contract), damages were an adequate remedy for the plaintiff's losses, and the balance of convenience and practical considerations (including unsuitability of mandatory relief and potential loss of credibility) favoured the first defendant.