19 Dec 2014
PAULINE MARY SCHUMACHER v SUMMERGROVE ESTATES LTD [2014] NZHC 3369
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 3369
- Court
- High Court
Defendants, as the successful party on review, were entitled to costs on a 2B basis covering both the original proceedings and the review; r 17.7 did not justify a reduction because pursuing two alternative grounds did not constitute unnecessary expense; quashing the Associate Judge's decision included quashing that Judge's costs order so costs for that stage are appropriate