16 May 2008
FISHER & PAYKEL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED V CREDIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC HC AK CIV 2006-404-6646
- Citation
- openlaw-51183584_0190_42a6_b803_43c54f7646e6.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the issue was interlocutory, substantive rights had not been finally determined, the contractual interpretation issue was not sufficiently clear or appropriate for appellate determination at this stage, and any error identified did not produce the requisite detriment to warrant the delay of an appeal.