15 Sept 2016
JELLYMAN v R [2016] NZCA 440
- Citation
- [2016] NZCA 440
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The convictions were upheld because the guilty and not guilty verdicts were logically available given material factual differences between the first and second alleged incidents, the jury had been properly and repeatedly directed on burden and standard of proof, the jury note did not demonstrate actual confusion about the onus, and the timing of deliberations did not indicate an illegitimate compromise.