9 Dec 2019
PAUL NEVILLE BUBLITZ v R [2019] NZSC 138
- Citation
- [2019] NZSC 138
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the issues raised were fact-specific deed-construction questions lacking general or public importance; the Court of Appeal's construction of 'control' as including 'real or effective control' was within bounds and had sufficient certainty for s 220 purposes; the stay and knowledge issues involved concurrent factual findings and no miscarriage of justice was shown.