3 Sept 2007
PAE (NEW ZEALAND) LIMTIED V BROSNAHAN, CARTER, AND PATTINSON HC WN CIV 2005-485-843
- Citation
- openlaw-90b9ae51_ccae_4571_9054_0df3c77c5d76.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Court granted leave under r438AA and ordered inspection under r322 because the laptop was plausibly relevant to central disputed financial data (debtors figures) and the Court was satisfied inspection by forensic experts under protective terms was necessary to enable proper determination of allegations of overstatement and dishonesty; orders were tailored with timing, cloning, confidentiality and reporting requirements and allocation of expert costs.