15 Dec 2021
The Court extended time and granted leave to the first respondent because, applying its discretionary criteria, it found the requirements for extension and leave were met and the proposed approved question correctly confined the appeal to the correctness of the High Court's decision on the first respondent's claim.
20 Apr 2005
Leave to cross-appeal was granted because there was an approved, arguable ground that the Court of Appeal may have adopted an erroneous approach to the assessment of damages for the established breach of fiduciary duty, warranting appellate consideration.
18 Aug 2003
Leave to bring the cross-appeal out of time is refused because, although the late filing was explained as an oversight, the proposed cross-appeal had no prospect of success given the trustees' substantive victory and the refusal to mediate was vindicated; accordingly the application is dismissed.