11 Aug 2009
MARCH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED V RFD INVESTMENTS LIMITED HC CHCH CIV 2009-409-001237
- Citation
- openlaw-ab99cdbd_d74a_4933_82d8_193f61aa0200.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The applicant established genuine disputes as to the demands and the respondents provided no timely notice of opposition nor satisfactory explanation for delay; accordingly leave to file opposition was properly declined and the statutory demands were set aside with costs to the applicant, with leave limited to be heard only on costs and disbursements.