23 Jul 2009
VAUGHAN V CHRISTIE AND ORS HC WN CIV 2009-485-000603
- Citation
- openlaw-42d5289c_ee2b_475b_aec8_c1722ac0e2d2.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for an extension of time is refused because the proposed review has no reasonable prospect of success: the Associate Judge's order for security for costs was a considered exercise of discretion, the quantum ($60,000) was proportionate and unassailable on the material before the court, the alleged grounds (perjury, natural justice, public interest, website material) lacked substance or evidential support, and the proceeding remains stayed unless the plaintiff provides the ordered security.