20 Dec 2011
COMFORTPLUS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) V PORTSMOUTH INVESTMENTS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) HC CHCH CIV-2010-409-002043
- Citation
- openlaw-2e0bdcc3_4fbc_4754_afec_58b56606d239.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The applicants have not satisfied the Court at this interlocutory stage that they were impeded by irrelevant discovery so as to justify an order for costs under r 8.29; because relevance under the Peruvian Guano approach and the plaintiffs' asserted lines of enquiry may only reliably be assessed once briefs of evidence and issues at trial are clarified, the application for special costs is adjourned to be considered when overall costs of the litigation are addressed.