15 Mar 2013
GAN V WILFRD HC CHCH CIV-2013-409-000442
- Citation
- openlaw-12ff1af2_8666_4369_ab23_e909859ec673.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court granted an interim order for possession because the plaintiffs demonstrated a strong arguable case (default under the head lease and disclaimer by liquidator), damages would not be an adequate remedy given the defendants' precarious financial position, the balance of convenience favoured plaintiffs (uncertain ability of defendants to meet arrears or damages and status quo following disclaimer), and overall justice favoured immediate possession.