29 Jun 2015
ARROW MATTING SYSTEMS LIMITED v IMPALA EQUITIES LIMITED [2015] NZHC 1479
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 1479
- Court
- High Court
The statutory demand was set aside because it included amounts that were not due and presently payable as at service and because Arrow demonstrated a fairly arguable cross-claim arising from Impala's alleged breaches that likely exceeded the threshold (demand less prescribed amount), establishing a genuine and substantial dispute under s290(4).