18 Sept 2006
SAVE HAPPY VALLEY V MIN OF CONSERVATION & ORS HC WN CIV-2006-485-1634
- Citation
- openlaw-8374ca83_140d_44d1_9409_c628aa44bd90.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Although the court did not find established impecuniosity, weighing the significant public interest in the litigation, the inability to fairly assess merits at an early stage, the plaintiff's unchallenged offer of $3,000, and absence of compelling evidence of impecuniosity, the court exercised its discretion to refuse the third defendant's application for $10,000 security for costs.