9 Oct 2014
VINCENT ROSS SIEMER v JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSIONER [2014] NZSC 138
- Citation
- [2014] NZSC 138
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the Registrar had already decided the application to dispense with security for costs and established Supreme Court authority precludes revisiting such matters under s 61A(1); White J correctly applied Reekie principles in reviewing the Deputy Registrar's decision under s 61A(3) and r 7(2); no risk of miscarriage of justice or issue of general/public importance was shown and the substantive appeal was deemed abandoned, rendering the leave application unsuitable for grant.