16 Sept 2008
MHKS V ENS HC CHCH CIV 2008-409-684
- Citation
- openlaw-86dac57f_854e_4c69_a2f5_cab6c192bff7.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The High Court allowed the appeal because the Judge's forward‑looking analysis was insufficient and the statutory test of 'necessary' under s14(1)(b) was not met: the protection order was imposed primarily to reassure the applicant rather than on objective evidence of a real ongoing risk to the applicant or the children, and therefore the final protection order was set aside.