14 Aug 2008
BODY CORPORATE 183523 AND ORS V TONY TAY & ASSOCIATES LIMITED AND ORS HC AK CIV 2004-404-004824
- Citation
- openlaw-ae7dd948_4dcb_4866_9af6_24532d74f8cb.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because the supplementary discovery sought was clearly necessary to identify responsible parties and the first defendant repeatedly refused to comply with a court order, the appropriate sanction was to strike out the first defendant's defence; ancillary applications (judgment, costs) were reserved and the instructing solicitor was granted leave to withdraw.