5 Apr 2023
YOUNG v ROSS (NO. 4) [2023] NZHC 750
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 750
- Court
- High Court
Leave to bring a second appeal was refused because none of the proposed grounds raised a question of law or fact capable of bona fide and serious argument of sufficient importance to justify further appeal; the contractual right was properly characterised as a chose in action vested in the Official Assignee on bankruptcy, the agreement could not preclude reference to matters of public record nor be given the expansive prospective meaning alleged, and the second applicant was not designated as a beneficiary under s 12 CCLA so had no enforceable contractual right.