14 Apr 2021
REANEY v REANEY [2021] NZHC 784
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 784
- Court
- High Court
The judge refused to deal with the receivership application without notice because the evidence did not satisfy the statutory requirement that appointment be reasonably necessary or just and equitable on the material before the court, and there was no demonstrated urgency or prejudice that warranted dispensing with notice; accordingly the application was directed to be served on the defendant and adjourned for an expedited hearing on notice.