7 Oct 2011
PALMER AND ANOR V WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL HC TAU CIV-2011-470-000618
- Citation
- openlaw-d5b3a900_4dd6_4cb5_afd9_431390e5afc4.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Applicants failed to establish a reasonably arguable case that the land is no longer required for its original harbour-related purposes; forestry and conservation objectives remain legitimately connected to the original purpose, so no offer-back obligation under s40 arose and the caveat cannot be sustained.