5 Jul 2011
FALOON V CIR (No.4)HC TAU CIV-2010-470-922
- Citation
- openlaw-dc508652_f9e5_4132_a84f_8a5c467937b7.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The indemnity costs order of $3,126.08 is confirmed because the interlocutory applications were meritless and without foundation, trustee status and an Ombudsman complaint do not constitute 'special reasons' to vary or discharge the costs order, and indemnity costs were appropriate to ensure the defendant is not out of pocket for repeated meritless litigation.