18 Dec 2014
NR v MR CA443/2014 [2014] NZCA 623
- Citation
- (2014) 22 PRNZ 635
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Both interlocutory applications were dismissed: the debarment application failed because allegations did not meet the high threshold for removal of counsel and were matters for courts or disciplinary bodies; the disclosure application failed because Waterhouse is confined to a narrow class of third-party funders and is not engaged where the defendant seeks disclosure of its own funding arrangements; costs were ordered against NR (majority) being standard band A with 50% uplift and usual disbursements; a permanent order forbidding publication of identifying particulars was made under s 39(1) H…