22 Jul 2015
DOUGLAS ARTHUR MONTROSE GRAHAM, MICHAEL HOWARD REEVES, WILLIAM PATRICK JEFFRIES AND LAWRENCE ROLAND VALPY BRYANT v R [2015] NZSC 109
- Citation
- [2015] NZSC 109
- Court
- Supreme Court
The recall application is dismissed because the grounds were misconceived and did not demonstrate miscarriage of justice: the Supreme Court was aware the Peden schedule was not a proved exhibit and its base figures were otherwise in evidence; the alleged procedural defects were either not established or not outcome‑determinative; the alleged departure from particulars was unfounded; issues of double counting did not undermine the overall evidential picture; and the applicants failed to raise these matters at the appropriate earlier stages making the recall an unjustified second shot.