5 Oct 2005
S V W HC CHCH CIV 2005 409 663
- Citation
- openlaw-c7fca282_dc88_423f_9a1f_3547588b642d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court exercised its discretion under s39B and refused admission of the bulk of the further evidence because it was either reasonably available before the Family Court, not cogent, hearsay or would require re-hearing; however two IRD memoranda dated 17 June 2002 and 20 August 2003 were admitted because they were generated by the respondent, were not discoverable by the appellant prior to the Family Court hearing and their nondisclosure justified admission in the interests of justice.