11 Jun 2009
NASH PROPERTIES LIMITED V HARRIS HOLDINGS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED HC AK CIV 2009-404-001013
- Citation
- openlaw-672ff024_d261_4fba_9371_29f2691625f9.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Nash failed to establish a substantial dispute or clear and persuasive grounds for set-off; the certified progress payment remained an independently recoverable debt despite later credits, the purchase price balance was not due and thus not available as set-off, and at least the certified unpaid balance plus a conservative interest estimate remained owing; therefore the statutory demand was not set aside and compliance time was extended.