10 Aug 2006
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V EDMONDS& ORS CA CA97/05
- Citation
- openlaw-5601b36d_e8c0_4e1b_af71_a8f774ee5ffd.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court concluded there was no inconsistency because the July 1996 date in the declaration expressly incorporates the twelve month period of grace applied to area A by this Court and by Miller J; accordingly the application for recall was not justified and is dismissed.