16 Mar 2017
Re Henderson [2017] NZHC 474
- Citation
- [2017] NZCCLR 20
- Court
- High Court
The applicant's 18 applications were refused because he failed to discharge the onus to demonstrate that permitting his involvement would not significantly diminish the public protection and deterrence purposes underlying the s299 prohibition: evidence was insufficiently particular (undefined roles, absent governance and safeguards, no contractual job descriptions), and prior findings of unfitness rendered the applications risky; adjournment with leave to reapply on properly amended applications and evidence was ordered.