23 Mar 2017
R v PANEPASA HAVEA [2017] NZHC 545
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 545
- Court
- High Court
The witness's confirmation of recognition together with contextual statements constituted a visual identification under s4; the evidence was admissible under s45 because the defendant did not prove unreliability and the witness's equivocal language affected weight for the jury not admissibility, so the identification evidence was permitted at trial.