9 Sept 2005
TAYLOR V REBEL GASOLINE LIMITED HC AK CIV 2005-404-003988
- Citation
- openlaw-1152d8bb_2f85_4035_bf53_de2d86626777.pdf
- Court
- High Court
On the facts the vendors validly preserved time being of the essence by extending the settlement notice to 3 June 2005, the purchaser repeatedly failed to perform rental and settlement obligations and gave broken assurances, there was no unequivocal conduct by the vendors amounting to affirmation or waiver after 3 June, the vendors validly re-entered and cancelled the agreement on 16 June 2005, and consequently the respondent had no reasonably arguable caveatable interest; the caveat is ordered removed under s143.