22 Aug 2007
ANDERSON AND ANDERSON V SORS AND STIPKOVICH AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2007-404-1069
- Citation
- openlaw-6caa9720_d39a_49ee_bea2_1c754aee04e6.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Although Hitex Plastering provided strong authority that the applicants validly appointed the arbitrator, the statutory language is not free from ambiguity and there was a responsible arguable construction available to the respondents; their conduct did not meet the threshold for increased or indemnity costs, so applicants are entitled only to conventional costs on the standard 2B basis.