5 May 2010
V A CRAWSHAW V S PAXTON-PENMAN AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2009-404-001828
- Citation
- openlaw-3f5ad8d3_a444_45a9_ba26_962bad686239.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court held the plaintiff's claims against the second defendant do not require determination of an employment relationship problem and therefore are not within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment Relations Authority; the $60,000 arose under the sale and purchase agreement as vendor-purchaser rights, not under the employment agreement, so the jurisdictional objection failed.